Evolution in the Information Age

When Charles Darwin published his theory, nothing was known of DNA. "Simple" cells seemed, well, simple. As it turns out simple cells are irreducibly complex as Michael Behe and others have demonstrated. His latest book, A Mousetrap for Darwin: Michael J. Behe Answers His Critics adds to and clarifies the issues. Atheist, Richard Dawkins and others continue trying to argue for Darwinism but the fundamental problem is they are "Missing the Point: Codes Are Not Products of Physics." They do not create and assemble themselves: 

Codes may make use of material building blocks, such as letters on a printed page or radio pulses through space, but the essence of a code is the information it conveys. The essence of a message is the intended meaning from the messenger. The meaning may be live or programmed. In either case, a code conveys the foresight of a mind with the intention to communicate.

With all the insistence about this fundamental aspect of codes by ID scientists for the past 36 years (and more), it is sad to see other scientists continuing to belabor the fallacy that codes can emerge from mindless processes. If that were true, it would be the equivalent of a miracle. If other want to dismiss the “miracles” they think that intelligent design requires, what should design advocates say about the evolutionists’ miracles of chance? If others wish to limit their explanatory toolkit to “natural laws,” what about the laws of probability?

The article in Evolution News goes on to cite claims by Biophysical scientists who work with DNA and points out something they seem to ignore.

Strangely absent is the word information in the scheme. It appears Darwinism has to rely on magic or miracle. 

https://mailchi.mp/3d9e0e914265/is-that-all-there-is-4321762?e=169825fd77