Question: The same logic must be applied to the phrase, “thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee” (Ps:2:7I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
See All...; Heb:1:5For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?
See All..., 5:5) as you apply to Calvin’s declaration that “in the very head of the Church we have a bright mirror of free election...[Christ] did not become the Son of God by living righteously, but was freely presented with this great honor....” Why do you insist upon Calvin being self-contradictory on this point when he was using a biblical phrase?...I would encourage you to completely drop that section [on p. 233 in What Love Is This?] accusing Calvin of such damnable and sickening heresy....
Answer: Thanks for your concern for accuracy in my book What Love Is This? I must, however, disagree with your defense of Calvin’s likening what he calls Christ’s alleged “election” to sonship, to election of certain people to salvation. You quote, “Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee” (Ps:2:7I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
See All...), from several translations (one would be enough), as well as the quotation of Psalm:2:7I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
See All... in Hebrews:1:5For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?
See All... and 5:5.
You then claim that this statement refers to a time when “Christ became the Son of God.” When would that have been? It must have been in eternity past, because Christ was clearly the Son of God before being born into the world (“and what is his son’s name, if thou canst tell?”- Prv 30:4; “a child is born [the babe through Mary]...a Son is given [the eternal Son of God incarnate] - Is 9:6). But there is no point in eternity that could be called “this day.” Time began with the creation of the universe (Gn 1:1). Furthermore, we agree that Christ, who is “the same yesterday, today and forever” (Heb:13:8Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
See All...), is eternally the Son of God. Therefore, there could have been no time when “Christ became the Son of God” as Calvin states and you contend in his defense.
Do we then have a contradiction in Scripture? Of course not. Psalm:2:7I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
See All... is not referring to Christ becoming the Son of God at all. That never happened. He always is the Son of God. Paul tells us that the phrase in Psalms:2:7I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
See All..., “this day have I begotten thee,” refers to His resurrection: “God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up [resurrected] Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee” (Acts:13:33God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee.
See All...). This agrees with His being called “the firstborn from the dead” (Col:1:18And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
See All...).
Sadly, Calvin was simply wrong on this point as on many others.